purewebmedia.biz - Drupal compared to WordPress and Joomla

Drupal compared to WordPress and Joomla | Pure Web Media | Web Design and Drupal CMS Web Development, Victoria BC

Purewebmedia.biz Spined HTML

Drupal compared to WordPress and Joomla | Pure Web Media | WebDiamondand Drupal CMS Web Development, Victoria BC Skip to main content ServicesPortfolioAboutHomeArticlesSupportContact AnalyzeDiamondDevelop Launch Drupal compared to WordPress and Joomla Printer-friendly version Monday, April 22, 2013Drupal and WordPress are two of the most worldwide CMS's out there and withal with Joomla are the most often compared systems. Note, however that there are literally thousands of CMS's out there!! This vendible will focus on these popular systems and try to wordplay the question: Which is the right nomination and how do you decide which is better? First of all, it's important to stave getting unprotected in the 'which is better' conversation, considering that is far too unstipulated an tideway and ultimately not very useful. The increasingly towardly question to ask is rather: Which is the weightier suited for your needs? As the owner of Pure Web Media and a web developer myself for 14 years, I would like to share the methods I have used historically for towers sites and how the progression came about: Methods and Tools: 1. Hand-coding with HTML, CSS, PHP, Javascript To be successful in web minutiae and web design, it's important to understand the nitty-gritty of what happens under the hood, to write wipe lawmaking and to identify the interactions between languages. This tideway enhances comprehension of what lawmaking standards midpoint and how to implement them effectively. Personally I still do, and probably unchangingly will, alimony hand-coding and thoroughly enjoy it. The dirt under a gardener's nails is a sign they're not wrung to get lanugo to the roots - and so it is with coding. 2. Mambo / Joomla (2 years experience) Mambo was my first CMS and initially it saved me a lot of time adapting this established framework of HTML, PHP, Javascript and MySQL - once you learned how that trademark of CMS worked. There was user wangle granularity, where I could make a Manager, an Editor, a Contributor - all with variegated degrees of wangle to content and user profiles - and that was terrific. However, It proved inadequate in its user-interface and with the lawmaking that it ultimately created, which was unwieldy and used villainous tags like the font tag and wrote outdated nature like size=, color= and other such misfits. Support was spotty and related forums had pioneer town tumbleweeds self-glorification through them. Eventually the minutiae team split from their internal politics and Mambo plodded onto it's doom, while the other half worked what became the Joomla release. The forfeiture was washed-up however and my faith was shaken in its future. I needed something increasingly robust to unhook forward-looking solutions for my clientele. I can't say where Joomla is at now but have heard cries of wound from clients whom have come from it, so I can't recommend it. To use a vehicle analogy, at the time it was a good Jazz scooter. 3. WordPress (3 years) WP was and still is a unconfined tool for what it was designed for: blogs or microsites (basic websites virtually 10 pages). In fact, I would say it is probably one of the weightier out of the box blogging solutions misogynist considering it gets you up and running quickly. It builds what are often referred to as 'microsites' or 'brochureware', which translates as a vital site consisting of a some static pages with imagery and perhaps a blog with tagging. When I used WP it was an incubation from Joomla and came out with somewhat cleaner lawmaking and a nicer admin interface. However, the multi-user granularity and tenancy over the templates and interface were still too limiting so I knew that ultimately I would need to move on. The trick was to find that CMS that would fulfill as many goals as possible considering looking towards the future, I knew client's needs would soon require a level of customization and functionality that WordPress simply was not designed for - which brings us when to the 'right tool for the job' paradigm. WordPress is relatively easy to learn and you don't need to be a programmer to build a site with it - which moreover highlights how it is limited when it comes to flexibility. Still, admittedly I liked WP and it served its function but as my skills grew withal with demands for customization, I knew I would outgrow that relationship. By now, there were hundreds of CMS's (and now there are over a thousand!) but we all know that popularity doesn't necessarily reflect equivalent quality. Unfortunately, WordPress is notorious for stuff the most hacked, least secure of the most widely used CMS's and numerous hosting companies that we use send out regular consumer bulletins mentioning flipside WP hack is out and circulating. Now, to be fair, it takes a skilled and experienced developer to make the site - any site - resilient versus hacking but since WordPress is used by so many novices, the security holes aren't closed. The lesson here is that no matter what CMS you choose, its quality is largely a matter of how experienced the developer is with it. Still, I knew flipside CMS solution was out there, an underdog which could do what WordPress could do but more. Continuing the analogy, WordPress is unreceptive to a Smartcar - efficiently suited for a particular task of running errands in a municipality but still limited for expansion. 4. Drupal (since 2006) As demands for a greater level of customization, features and well-constructed diamond self-rule grew, I needed to search for a increasingly capable CMS. The contenders then were Plone, Django (both use the Python language), and Drupal (PHP). After much research and comparison, Drupal presented itself as the most practical wordplay since it combined features I appreciated from Joomla and WordPress but then went vastitude them both in terms of capabilities. It's known as a developer's dream considering it is so highly unsteadfast and as a programmer that moreover meant learning Drupal's inner workings took slightly longer than either Joomla or WordPress had but it was in those depths that treasure lay: A powerful theming engine, hooks, well-constructed tenancy over the user interface, the worthiness to intercept and transpiration output in any way I wanted, and stuff worldly-wise to match any graphic diamond to the site - Drupal was built with these needs in mind, this self-rule of customization - and that's its edge. We rode out version 5, then 6 which was vastly improved but could have been better. With the outstart of Drupal 7 over a year ago, the system lept to rhadamanthine a simpler and yet increasingly powerful tool. I love working with it. If you're considering programming with or having a site built with Drupal, know that [in the right hands] your needs can be met to the letter, right lanugo the controls, inputs, etc. To use yet flipside analogy, WordPress is like a toolkit that you might alimony in your car - the wrench, screwdriver set, pliers - the nuts which can get you by and that is a good thing. As a Drupal developer however, you instead walk into an industrial arts workshop well-constructed with power tools, workbench, jigsaw, just well-nigh anything you'd need - which is simply awesome. It can be used for small microsites, medium sized or near-enterprise level. Drupal enjoys a reputation for having the least number of hacks and exploits on average. In fact, it's what the WhiteHouse.gov is built with (also: Knowledge Network, MTV, Macword, FedEx). Of course, it's not perfect - every CMS has its challenges - but you get tremendous versatility which makes a crucial difference highlighting that a Drupal site can be anything that a WordPress site can be but the reverse is typically not true. Why segregate something less capable considering it's increasingly popular? If Drupal were a car, it would be a 4-door Subaru Forester - not quite an SUV but powerful unbearable so I can momentum in the city, go camping up the tailspin or navigate the country easily. Conclusion: AnUnsteadfastCMS Means the Greatest FreedomIncubationtells us the most adaptive species are those which survive. I don't want my client's websites to be just 'good enough' but they need to instead be unsteadfast to not just current needs but future ones as well. This highlights Pure Web Media's nomination to focus and offer the benefits of the Drupal CMS. It's essential to have the worthiness to create a site towardly for a client's needs, worldly-wise to facilitate a modern diamond (which ultimately frees the designer to be as creative as they want) and we can't ignore the importance of adaptive / responsive websites. Both WordPress and Drupal are good at that, but as I mentioned, I'd rather segregate the most flexible framework for my clients. It's important to note that we are not brand-loyal however. Drupal may be the weightier overall solution for a website framework right now, but like evolution, transpiration is the only constant. There are other CMS's other than the ones discussed which from a loftiness seem that they could wilt top contenders, so we will alimony our eye on those. Until then however, Drupal is the wisest nomination for now in our opinion. drupal, security, software Testimonials Raj brings professionalism and innovation to every project he approaches. Juniper English read increasingly Recent Articles Victoria WebMinutiaewith LibSass, Node.js, Gulp Drupal 8 CMS Has Landed Drupal 6 Support to End in Feb 2016 Responsive Inline Images with the Picture module and CKEditor 4 How to Setup Drush on Shared Hosting 1 of 6next › read increasingly © 2018 PureWebMedia.biz Links Services PortfolioWell-nighHome Articles Support Contact Social Media facebooktwitterlinkedin Contact 308 - 1138 View St. Victoria, BC V8V 3M1 250-208-5898 info@purewebmedia.biz